ЁЯУК Expert Level: Hard (Score: 4/5)ЁЯУИ Pass Data: 31.93%ЁЯОп Target Time: 76sтП▒я╕П Time Taken: 0s
Select the most appropriate idiom that can substitute the highlighted segment in the given sentence. After weeks of ignoring the issue, the manager finally addressed the problem directly and dealt with the situation without avoiding it.
рд╕рд╣реА рдЙрддреНрддрд░: рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдк (4)
рд╡реНрдпрд╛рдЦреНрдпрд╛: рдХрд┐рд╕реА рдХрдард┐рди рдпрд╛ рдЦрддрд░рдирд╛рдХ рд╕реНрдерд┐рддрд┐ рдХрд╛ рд╕реАрдзреЗ рдФрд░ рд╕рд╛рд╣рд╕рдкреВрд░реНрд╡рдХ рд╕рд╛рдордирд╛ рдХрд░рдиреЗ (addressed the problem directly and dealt with the situation) рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП 'took the bull by the horns' рдореБрд╣рд╛рд╡рд░реЗ рдХрд╛ рдкреНрд░рдпреЛрдЧ рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рдЬрд╛рддрд╛ рд╣реИред рдЕрдиреНрдп рдореБрд╣рд╛рд╡рд░реЛрдВ рдХреЗ рдЕрд░реНрде: - faced the music (рдХрд┐рдП рдЧрдП рдХрд╛рд░реНрдпреЛрдВ рдХрд╛ рдкрд░рд┐рдгрд╛рдо рднреБрдЧрддрдирд╛) - got down to brass tacks (рдореБрдЦреНрдп рдореБрджреНрджреЗ рдкрд░ рдмрд╛рдд рд╢реБрд░реВ рдХрд░рдирд╛) - cracked the code (рд╕рдорд╕реНрдпрд╛ рд╕реБрд▓рдЭрд╛рдирд╛) рдЕрддрдГ рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдк 4 рд╕рд╣реА рд╣реИред
ЁЯУК Expert Level: Hard (Score: 4/5)ЁЯУИ Pass Data: 30.81%ЁЯОп Target Time: 83sтП▒я╕П Time Taken: 0s
Sentences/segments of a paragraph are given below in jumbled order. Arrange them in the correct order to form a meaningful and coherent paragraph. A. this raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of logging in the tropics B. trees of recovering tropical forests were found to have tougher leaves C. and are pushing the nutrient content towards ecological limits D. both essential for plant and tree growth, than trees of old-growth forests E. this suggests that multiple cycles of logging and recovery irreversibly remove phosphorus from the forest system F. with lower concentrations of nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen
ЁЯУК Expert Level: Hard (Score: 4/5)ЁЯУИ Pass Data: 28.50%ЁЯОп Target Time: 77sтП▒я╕П Time Taken: 0s
Sentences of a paragraph are given below. While the first and the last sentences (S1 and S6) are in the correct order, the sentences in between are jumbled up. Arrange the sentences in the correct order to form a meaningful and coherent paragraph. S1. Value-based decision-making is pervasive in nature. A. Examples include basic animal behaviours such as bee foraging, and complicated human decisions such as trading in the stock market. B. It occurs whenever an organism makes a choice from several alternatives based on the subjective value. C. It studies the computations that the brain makes in order to make value-based decisions. D. This behaviour is known as neuroeconomics, which is a relatively new discipline. S6. The field brings together models, tools, and techniques from several disciplines.
ЁЯУК Expert Level: Hard (Score: 4/5)ЁЯУИ Pass Data: 31.47%ЁЯОп Target Time: 70sтП▒я╕П Time Taken: 0s
Select the most appropriate idiom that can substitute the highlighted segment in the given sentence. He kept trying to convince her to change her decision, but she refused to change her mind no matter what he said.
рд╕рд╣реА рдЙрддреНрддрд░: рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдк (3)
рд╡реНрдпрд╛рдЦреНрдпрд╛: "refused to change her mind" (рдЕрдкрдиреА рдмрд╛рдд рдпрд╛ рдлреИрд╕рд▓реЗ рдкрд░ рдЕрдбрд╝реЗ рд░рд╣рдирд╛) рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рд╕рдЯреАрдХ рдореБрд╣рд╛рд╡рд░рд╛ "stuck to her guns" рд╣реИред рдЕрдиреНрдп рдореБрд╣рд╛рд╡рд░реЛрдВ рдХреЗ рдЕрд░реНрде: - went the extra mile (рдЕрддрд┐рд░рд┐рдХреНрдд рдкреНрд░рдпрд╛рд╕ рдХрд░рдирд╛) - jumped on the bandwagon (рд▓реЛрдХрдкреНрд░рд┐рдп рдЪрд▓рди рдХрд╛ рд╣рд┐рд╕реНрд╕рд╛ рдмрдирдирд╛) - turned a blind eye (рдЕрдирджреЗрдЦрд╛ рдХрд░рдирд╛) рдЕрддрдГ рд╡рд┐рдХрд▓реНрдк 3 рд╕рд╣реА рд╣реИред
Select the most appropriate article to fill in the blank. If no article is needed, select 'No article required'. It took us an hour to find ______ hotel in this city.
Select the most appropriate article to fill in the blank. If no article is needed, select 'No article required'. With _______ help of honey hunters, researchers carried out controlled experiments.
Identify the synonym of the word 'melancholy' in the following sentence. The garden was filled with exuberant blooms and mirthful birdsong, creating a delightful scene, yet a mournful tune played in the distance, reminding everyone of their loss.
ЁЯУК Expert Level: Hard (Score: 4/5)ЁЯУИ Pass Data: 23.64%ЁЯОп Target Time: 70sтП▒я╕П Time Taken: 0s
Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow. Throughout history, scientific advancements have been heralded as milestones of human achievement, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and reshaping societies. However, the paradox of progress lies in its unintended consequences. The same discoveries that have eradicated diseases and enhanced communication have also fueled conflicts and ethical dilemmas. For instance, the discovery of nuclear fission revolutionised energy production but also led to the devastating creation of nuclear weapons. Similarly, artificial intelligence has streamlined industries, yet it raises concerns about job displacement and algorithmic biases. The moral complexities of scientific advancements question whether technological progress equates to human progress. The structure of scientific breakthroughs follows a cyclical pattern тАФ initial excitement, mass adoption, unforeseen consequences, and eventual regulation. This cycle underscores the necessity for ethical considerations to precede innovation. The historical case of DDT, initially lauded for eradicating malaria-carrying mosquitoes, later became infamous for its environmental toxicity, leading to a ban in several nations. Such instances highlight the need for pre-emptive scrutiny rather than reactive corrections. In modern discourse, ethical frameworks like bioethics and AI ethics attempt to anticipate the ramifications of new technologies. However, these frameworks remain reactive rather than proactive. The question persists: Can society navigate the fine line between innovation and its unintended consequences, or will history continue its cycle of discovery and regret?
ЁЯУК Expert Level: Hard (Score: 4/5)ЁЯУИ Pass Data: 30.00%ЁЯОп Target Time: 71sтП▒я╕П Time Taken: 0s
Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow. Throughout history, scientific advancements have been heralded as milestones of human achievement, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and reshaping societies. However, the paradox of progress lies in its unintended consequences. The same discoveries that have eradicated diseases and enhanced communication have also fueled conflicts and ethical dilemmas. For instance, the discovery of nuclear fission revolutionised energy production but also led to the devastating creation of nuclear weapons. Similarly, artificial intelligence has streamlined industries, yet it raises concerns about job displacement and algorithmic biases. The moral complexities of scientific advancements question whether technological progress equates to human progress. The structure of scientific breakthroughs follows a cyclical pattern тАФ initial excitement, mass adoption, unforeseen consequences, and eventual regulation. This cycle underscores the necessity for ethical considerations to precede innovation. The historical case of DDT, initially lauded for eradicating malaria-carrying mosquitoes, later became infamous for its environmental toxicity, leading to a ban in several nations. Such instances highlight the need for pre-emptive scrutiny rather than reactive corrections. In modern discourse, ethical frameworks like bioethics and AI ethics attempt to anticipate the ramifications of new technologies. However, these frameworks remain reactive rather than proactive. The question persists: Can society navigate the fine line between innovation and its unintended consequences, or will history continue its cycle of discovery and regret?
Which option best describes the structure of the passage?
ЁЯУК Expert Level: Hard (Score: 4/5)ЁЯУИ Pass Data: 22.90%ЁЯОп Target Time: 70sтП▒я╕П Time Taken: 0s
Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow. Throughout history, scientific advancements have been heralded as milestones of human achievement, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and reshaping societies. However, the paradox of progress lies in its unintended consequences. The same discoveries that have eradicated diseases and enhanced communication have also fueled conflicts and ethical dilemmas. For instance, the discovery of nuclear fission revolutionised energy production but also led to the devastating creation of nuclear weapons. Similarly, artificial intelligence has streamlined industries, yet it raises concerns about job displacement and algorithmic biases. The moral complexities of scientific advancements question whether technological progress equates to human progress. The structure of scientific breakthroughs follows a cyclical pattern тАФ initial excitement, mass adoption, unforeseen consequences, and eventual regulation. This cycle underscores the necessity for ethical considerations to precede innovation. The historical case of DDT, initially lauded for eradicating malaria-carrying mosquitoes, later became infamous for its environmental toxicity, leading to a ban in several nations. Such instances highlight the need for pre-emptive scrutiny rather than reactive corrections. In modern discourse, ethical frameworks like bioethics and AI ethics attempt to anticipate the ramifications of new technologies. However, these frameworks remain reactive rather than proactive. The question persists: Can society navigate the fine line between innovation and its unintended consequences, or will history continue its cycle of discovery and regret?
How does the passage connect to real-world issues?
Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow. Throughout history, scientific advancements have been heralded as milestones of human achievement, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and reshaping societies. However, the paradox of progress lies in its unintended consequences. The same discoveries that have eradicated diseases and enhanced communication have also fueled conflicts and ethical dilemmas. For instance, the discovery of nuclear fission revolutionised energy production but also led to the devastating creation of nuclear weapons. Similarly, artificial intelligence has streamlined industries, yet it raises concerns about job displacement and algorithmic biases. The moral complexities of scientific advancements question whether technological progress equates to human progress. The structure of scientific breakthroughs follows a cyclical pattern тАФ initial excitement, mass adoption, unforeseen consequences, and eventual regulation. This cycle underscores the necessity for ethical considerations to precede innovation. The historical case of DDT, initially lauded for eradicating malaria-carrying mosquitoes, later became infamous for its environmental toxicity, leading to a ban in several nations. Such instances highlight the need for pre-emptive scrutiny rather than reactive corrections. In modern discourse, ethical frameworks like bioethics and AI ethics attempt to anticipate the ramifications of new technologies. However, these frameworks remain reactive rather than proactive. The question persists: Can society navigate the fine line between innovation and its unintended consequences, or will history continue its cycle of discovery and regret?
Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow. Throughout history, scientific advancements have been heralded as milestones of human achievement, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and reshaping societies. However, the paradox of progress lies in its unintended consequences. The same discoveries that have eradicated diseases and enhanced communication have also fueled conflicts and ethical dilemmas. For instance, the discovery of nuclear fission revolutionised energy production but also led to the devastating creation of nuclear weapons. Similarly, artificial intelligence has streamlined industries, yet it raises concerns about job displacement and algorithmic biases. The moral complexities of scientific advancements question whether technological progress equates to human progress. The structure of scientific breakthroughs follows a cyclical pattern тАФ initial excitement, mass adoption, unforeseen consequences, and eventual regulation. This cycle underscores the necessity for ethical considerations to precede innovation. The historical case of DDT, initially lauded for eradicating malaria-carrying mosquitoes, later became infamous for its environmental toxicity, leading to a ban in several nations. Such instances highlight the need for pre-emptive scrutiny rather than reactive corrections. In modern discourse, ethical frameworks like bioethics and AI ethics attempt to anticipate the ramifications of new technologies. However, these frameworks remain reactive rather than proactive. The question persists: Can society navigate the fine line between innovation and its unintended consequences, or will history continue its cycle of discovery and regret?